With lightning speeds and zero fees, EOS blows other blockchains out of the water for user experience. For developers, though, it's proving costly.
A system for holding referenda on EOS is expected to launch soon. And that could release a huge pile of funds – or get rid of it.
EOS' launch has been fraught with controversy. Some users are fed up, and they're forking the protocol to give the network a better shot.
Blockchain-based Wikipedia competitor Everipedia launched its mainnet on Thursday, based on the EOS network.
The EOS blockchain may soon see what appears to be the first stablecoin on its platform if a startup's plan comes to fruition.
According to researchers at Cornell, blockchains utilizing on-chain voting – such as EOS and Tezos – are vulnerable to certain vote buying attacks.
In a fresh round of funding, Block.one has added to its line-up of major investors PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel and bitcoin mining giant Bitmain.
When the company that created EOS starts voting for validators, there will be little chance of winning a spot without earning its support.
Block.one, the company behind the EOS blockchain, has just hired a former Jefferies Group LLC executive to lead its $1 billion venture capital arm.
The EOS governance disaster offers a strong reminder of how entrenched human mistrust can be difficult to overcome.
Attempts to sort out the results of hacks and scams have resulted in a constitutional crisis.
Dispute settlement in EOS is being handled by a group called ECAF, but its role – and how it should communicate – still needs to be figured out.
China's Global Public Chain Assessment Index has released its second monthly evaluation of blockchain networks – with perhaps surprising results.
Tezos announced its handing the blockchain over to the community after launch. And that's not the only way the project is similar to EOS.
For the second time in EOS' infancy, transactions are being censored. For some, it's a way to stop scammers. For others, it's centralized overreach.