Denmark’s Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) today issued an official statement on the use of virtual currency in the country – and surprisingly, it’s not all bad news.
Although the FSA’s statement echoed warnings issued by the European Banking Authority (EBA) and red flags from regulators worldwide, it emphasised that cryptocurrencies, including bitcoin, will not be policed by Denmark’s financial regulators.
The statement highlights that virtual currency isn’t covered by Denmark’s existing regulatory framework. Thus, cryptocurrencies cannot be subjected to the country’s standard financial regulation.
According to the FSA, doing business with bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies does not qualify as issuance of electronic money, currency exchanges, brokerages or deposit services. The regulator stated:
“Virtual currencies are a form of unregulated electronic money, as opposed to real money they are not issued or guaranteed by a central bank, which in some cases can be used to make payments.”
It added that: “Virtual currencies have emerged in many different forms, first in the context of online gaming and social networks. Later, virtual currencies evolved to be used as an alternative to real currency.”
As a result, bitcoin entrepreneurs who want to build businesses and establish exchanges in the country will not need government approval. A translation from the FSA’s website reads:
“Companies do not need permission to be able to establish their operation in Denmark if they want to run bitcoin exchanges that also include exchanging real money.”
However, like the EBA, the FSA pointed out that investors who choose to buy, trade and hold virtual currencies risk losing their investments, having their virtual currency stolen, or simply watching the value of their currency drop to zero.
The EBA has also warned that there is no assurance that virtual currencies can be exchanged for national currencies, adding that trading virtual currencies carries implications for both tax and crime.
Interestingly, the FSA is the first national regulator to implicitly name altcoins in its warning. The somewhat unflattering reference includes litecoin, zerocoin and linden dollars.
The FSA also added that bitcoin is accepted as payment by an increasing number of businesses both online and offline.
Denmark’s ‘hands-off’ approach to bitcoin regulation is interesting, but will other nations follow?
This article was co-authored by Grace Caffyn and Nermin Hajdarbegovic
Denmark Flag image via Shutterstock